Third, the bulk of the study will be taken up with an in-depth exegesis of the passage. Fourth, and final, certain similarities and differences between Paul and Peter will be delineated. Does this mean that we should on that basis question its authenticity? and ) of the gospel to all people as outlined in the book of Romans clearly indicates its worldwide agenda. This, then, leads to the inevitable question of the relation of Christians to the state or governing authorities. His first two specific points include the idea that the passage is tightly constructed without logical connection to the previous section, and as such it not only stands in isolation, but also interrupts the flow of the argument in the context.
Even if Gamble's conclusion is rejected, it is questionable to assert that a pericope (i.e.
The purpose of this study is to focus on what Paul had to say about authorities in Romans 13 in order that we Christians might better understand how it is that God would have us relate to those whom he, in is his sovereignty, has placed over us.
The study will examine Paul's teaching on the Christian's relation to the civil authorities as outlined in Romans 13:1-7 and then compare that with 1 Peter -17.
the relation of -21 to 13:1-7 and 13:1-7 to 13:8-14).
It seems that Paul's focus on "good" and "evil" in , 21 and the Christian's responsibility to be at peace with all people () provide sufficient basis for seeing a logical connection to 13:l-7—even though no grammatical connection is explicitly made through the use of or some other Pauline connector.