Kevin lockman dating sites

In particular, their time developing the With the cancellation of the Anarky series, and the eventual departure of each artist from DC Comics— first by Grant, followed by Breyfogle— their mutual career paths split, and Anarky entered into a period of obscurity.During this period, Breyfogle came to suspect that the treatment each man, and Anarky, had received from their former employer was suspect. I see it in the treatment from Wikipedia; I see it in the treatment toward Alan Grant from DC Comics; I see it in the treatment from mainstream media and the establishment.Again, even the anti-business blog saw the “Bi” obsession to destroy Neo-Tech and Wallace despite the facts, and therefore made the remarkable move of deleting the entire thread of “Bi” against us. Wikipedia resists relatives, friends, and employees from contributing to an article out of concern that the subject would be favored, yet Wales saw no problem with a negative force so strong that it overwhelmed the Neo-Tech and Frank R. When I articulated this shortcoming to Jimmy Wales, he simply shrugged it off indicating that others can debate against the negative.But he missed the fundamental point: that even with the rigorous debate on my father’s and Neo-Tech as evidenced today, years later, by the comments on my father’s Talk page Frank_R._Wallace .

We refused to speak to several reporters, for they were out to besmirch Neo-Tech. For decades we turned down all requests for interviews, for they were only attempting to smear us.After my father died, this “Bi” harbored an obsession to destroy my father, his works, credibility, reputation and legacy.“Bi” proliferated across the web the idea that Neo-Tech Mediation Page: Requests_for_mediation/Frank_R._Wallace After browsing through those four Talk pages (four links directly above), remember that Jimmy Wales saw all this yet seemed blind to the obvious: a person obsessed with destroying someone featured on Wikipedia, stalking his page and finding excuses to remove positive or even neutral remarks, can cause a much greater negative force at work than a positive or neutral force.Today we have Wikipedia editors who skim the Google search engine on Neo-Tech journalists and bloggers.He even planted a non sequitur by citing a person who went to prison, and he dishonestly used it as a reference for one of IMA’s dba’s (and this citation is a non-Internet reference so the reader cannot link to the article and discover the dishonest non sequitur).I tried to explain this to Wales, but he would not see the obvious.

82

Leave a Reply