Patent office with evidence invalidating

He admits readily that publicly taking on this “dangerous new breed of patent troll” — a fight that Cloudflare has blogged about extensively — is good for business.

It’s also good for recruiting talent into the company, which has 250 employees at its headquarters and runs smaller offices in Boston and Champaign, Illinois, among other spots.

Part of its campaign involves highlighting the backgrounds of Blackbird co-founder Wendy Verlander, a litigator previously with Wilmer Hale, as well as her co-founder, Chris Freeman, formerly of Kirkland & Ellis, to “pro innovation” state legislators in both Massachusetts and Illinois, where Blackbird has offices.

Its argument to these individuals: that every lawyer must pass an ethics exam that states it’s a violation for an attorney to “acquire a cause of action,” then to go and sue someone over it.

Several years ago, two other top patent-defense litigators, John Desmarais and Matt Powers, also left their respective law firms, Kirkland & Ellis and Weil Gotshal & Manges, to become what some critics have called patent trolls.

The trend represents a dangerous new twist in the patent wars.

When it asked Newegg for million in damages, it might have imagined extracting some amount of money from the company easily. Not only might the amount have destroyed the company, which is now 16 years old, Newegg, which viewed Soverain as an extortionist, opted against settling for fear the decision would invite future patent suits.

patent office with evidence invalidating-11patent office with evidence invalidating-6

In other words, it will ask that Blackbird’s patents are reexamined.Even more unusual, however, and potentially more meaningful for other companies, is Cloudflare’s response to the suit.Indeed, when Prince was handed that envelope on a sunny March afternoon, he saw it as a moment he’d been waiting for since co-founding Cloudflare seven years earlier.Because firms like Blackbird and their ilk can operate more cost-effectively than patent trolls that must pay for outside legal help — they need only invest their time in researching which patents to buy from brokers who deal in such things, then pay the roughly

In other words, it will ask that Blackbird’s patents are reexamined.

Even more unusual, however, and potentially more meaningful for other companies, is Cloudflare’s response to the suit.

Indeed, when Prince was handed that envelope on a sunny March afternoon, he saw it as a moment he’d been waiting for since co-founding Cloudflare seven years earlier.

Because firms like Blackbird and their ilk can operate more cost-effectively than patent trolls that must pay for outside legal help — they need only invest their time in researching which patents to buy from brokers who deal in such things, then pay the roughly $1,000 it costs to file a lawsuit — they can do more damage.

It’s for this reason that Prince sees Cloudflare’s primary mission as figuring out how to increase Blackbird’s costs.

||

In other words, it will ask that Blackbird’s patents are reexamined.Even more unusual, however, and potentially more meaningful for other companies, is Cloudflare’s response to the suit.Indeed, when Prince was handed that envelope on a sunny March afternoon, he saw it as a moment he’d been waiting for since co-founding Cloudflare seven years earlier.Because firms like Blackbird and their ilk can operate more cost-effectively than patent trolls that must pay for outside legal help — they need only invest their time in researching which patents to buy from brokers who deal in such things, then pay the roughly $1,000 it costs to file a lawsuit — they can do more damage.It’s for this reason that Prince sees Cloudflare’s primary mission as figuring out how to increase Blackbird’s costs.Blackbird’s specific lawsuit against Cloudflare accuses it of violating U. Kaufmann hasn’t responded to a request for comment for this story, but a patent record shows he sold the patent last October for $1 plus “other good and valuable consideration” to Blackbird, which is also using the patent to sue another startup called Fastly. So-called non-practicing entities — or holders of a patent for a process or product that they don’t plan to develop — often use them to sue companies that would sooner settle rather than pay what can add up to $1 million by the time a case reaches a courtroom.

,000 it costs to file a lawsuit — they can do more damage.It’s for this reason that Prince sees Cloudflare’s primary mission as figuring out how to increase Blackbird’s costs.Blackbird’s specific lawsuit against Cloudflare accuses it of violating U. Kaufmann hasn’t responded to a request for comment for this story, but a patent record shows he sold the patent last October for

In other words, it will ask that Blackbird’s patents are reexamined.

Even more unusual, however, and potentially more meaningful for other companies, is Cloudflare’s response to the suit.

Indeed, when Prince was handed that envelope on a sunny March afternoon, he saw it as a moment he’d been waiting for since co-founding Cloudflare seven years earlier.

Because firms like Blackbird and their ilk can operate more cost-effectively than patent trolls that must pay for outside legal help — they need only invest their time in researching which patents to buy from brokers who deal in such things, then pay the roughly $1,000 it costs to file a lawsuit — they can do more damage.

It’s for this reason that Prince sees Cloudflare’s primary mission as figuring out how to increase Blackbird’s costs.

||

In other words, it will ask that Blackbird’s patents are reexamined.Even more unusual, however, and potentially more meaningful for other companies, is Cloudflare’s response to the suit.Indeed, when Prince was handed that envelope on a sunny March afternoon, he saw it as a moment he’d been waiting for since co-founding Cloudflare seven years earlier.Because firms like Blackbird and their ilk can operate more cost-effectively than patent trolls that must pay for outside legal help — they need only invest their time in researching which patents to buy from brokers who deal in such things, then pay the roughly $1,000 it costs to file a lawsuit — they can do more damage.It’s for this reason that Prince sees Cloudflare’s primary mission as figuring out how to increase Blackbird’s costs.Blackbird’s specific lawsuit against Cloudflare accuses it of violating U. Kaufmann hasn’t responded to a request for comment for this story, but a patent record shows he sold the patent last October for $1 plus “other good and valuable consideration” to Blackbird, which is also using the patent to sue another startup called Fastly. So-called non-practicing entities — or holders of a patent for a process or product that they don’t plan to develop — often use them to sue companies that would sooner settle rather than pay what can add up to $1 million by the time a case reaches a courtroom.

plus “other good and valuable consideration” to Blackbird, which is also using the patent to sue another startup called Fastly. So-called non-practicing entities — or holders of a patent for a process or product that they don’t plan to develop — often use them to sue companies that would sooner settle rather than pay what can add up to

In other words, it will ask that Blackbird’s patents are reexamined.

Even more unusual, however, and potentially more meaningful for other companies, is Cloudflare’s response to the suit.

Indeed, when Prince was handed that envelope on a sunny March afternoon, he saw it as a moment he’d been waiting for since co-founding Cloudflare seven years earlier.

Because firms like Blackbird and their ilk can operate more cost-effectively than patent trolls that must pay for outside legal help — they need only invest their time in researching which patents to buy from brokers who deal in such things, then pay the roughly $1,000 it costs to file a lawsuit — they can do more damage.

It’s for this reason that Prince sees Cloudflare’s primary mission as figuring out how to increase Blackbird’s costs.

||

In other words, it will ask that Blackbird’s patents are reexamined.Even more unusual, however, and potentially more meaningful for other companies, is Cloudflare’s response to the suit.Indeed, when Prince was handed that envelope on a sunny March afternoon, he saw it as a moment he’d been waiting for since co-founding Cloudflare seven years earlier.Because firms like Blackbird and their ilk can operate more cost-effectively than patent trolls that must pay for outside legal help — they need only invest their time in researching which patents to buy from brokers who deal in such things, then pay the roughly $1,000 it costs to file a lawsuit — they can do more damage.It’s for this reason that Prince sees Cloudflare’s primary mission as figuring out how to increase Blackbird’s costs.Blackbird’s specific lawsuit against Cloudflare accuses it of violating U. Kaufmann hasn’t responded to a request for comment for this story, but a patent record shows he sold the patent last October for $1 plus “other good and valuable consideration” to Blackbird, which is also using the patent to sue another startup called Fastly. So-called non-practicing entities — or holders of a patent for a process or product that they don’t plan to develop — often use them to sue companies that would sooner settle rather than pay what can add up to $1 million by the time a case reaches a courtroom.

million by the time a case reaches a courtroom.

693

Leave a Reply